Now Reading
Sir Roger Penrose

Sir Roger Penrose

To me, the world of perfect forms is primary (as was Plato’s own belief) — its existence being almost a logical necessity — and both the other two worlds are its shadows.

Sir Roger Penrose, born in 1931 in Colchester, England, has significantly shaped our understanding of the cosmos through his contributions to mathematical physics. Trained in algebraic geometry at the University of Cambridge, his work has bridged abstract mathematics and the deep structures of reality. In 2020, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics for discoveries related to black holes, sharing the honor with Andrea Ghez and Reinhard Genzel.

Penrose’s research, often in collaboration with Stephen Hawking, demonstrated that matter within a black hole collapses to a singularity—a point where mass reaches infinite density and conventional understanding breaks down. This insight advanced the study of black holes, revealing their fundamental role in the universe’s fabric.

Beyond the mathematics, Penrose introduced the Penrose diagram, a method for mapping the space-time surrounding black holes. This tool allows for visualizing how gravity interacts with matter and light as they approach these regions, offering a conceptual bridge between abstract theory and observable phenomena. Penrose’s work invites reflection on the boundaries of knowledge and the structures underpinning existence.



In the later phase of his career, Roger Penrose shifted focus from the vast reaches of the cosmos to the intricate depths of the mind, seeking to understand consciousness. He proposed that quantum mechanics, the framework governing the behavior of particles at the smallest scales, might hold the key to explaining conscious experience. This idea, as provocative as his earlier work on black holes, was explored in his books The Emperor’s New Mind (1989) and Shadows of the Mind (1994).

In The Emperor’s New Mind, Penrose draws on Gödel’s incompleteness theorem to argue that human thought transcends algorithmic computation. Gödel’s theorem reveals that within any consistent mathematical system, there are statements that are true but unprovable within the system itself. Penrose extends this insight, suggesting that human consciousness can grasp truths inaccessible to purely computational processes.

This argument directly challenges the computational theory of mind, which likens the brain to a machine and consciousness to an emergent property of complex computation. Penrose’s perspective proposes that the mind’s operations are non-algorithmic and that its nature may be rooted in quantum phenomena. This idea, while controversial, connects the study of consciousness to the foundational questions of quantum mechanics, hinting at an interplay between the physical and the experiential that remains unresolved.

In The Road to Reality, within the chapter “The Godelian Case,” Penrose examines the implications of Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorems in the context of mathematics and geometry. A central feature of this discussion is the cubic array of spheres depicted in Figure 2.1, a visual model that bridges abstract mathematics and physical geometry.

The cubic array serves as more than a mere illustration. It underscores the importance of spatial arrangements in mathematical cognition, proposing that geometry is not only a tool for organizing thought but also a medium for accessing deeper truths. Penrose uses this model to suggest that our understanding of mathematical concepts is often grounded in spatial reasoning, where physical forms and arrangements catalyze intuitive insights.

Through this lens, the interplay of spheres in the cubic array becomes a metaphor for the alignment between the abstract and the concrete. The structure exemplifies how geometrical visualization can illuminate principles that seem elusive in purely symbolic form. By positioning geometry as a foundational element in mathematical thought, Penrose invites reflection on the non-algorithmic, intuitive processes that connect the human mind to the mathematical fabric of reality.

Penrose’s use of the cubic array of spheres aligns with his critique of reductionist approaches to human cognition, which often reduce thought to formal systems or computational frameworks. The geometric model illustrates his argument for a broader perspective on mathematical insight, one that integrates spatial reasoning and intuitive understanding as essential components of human thought.

By foregrounding geometry in this context, Penrose challenges the mechanistic view of cognition that dominates much of contemporary thought. His framework suggests that mathematical understanding is not confined to symbolic manipulation but emerges through an interplay between abstract reasoning and the intuitive grasp of spatial relationships. The cubic array becomes a symbolic counterpoint to algorithmic models, highlighting how geometrical intuition informs and enriches human cognitive processes.

Penrose’s approach calls for a reassessment of the foundations of cognition. It shifts the focus from computation to a deeper engagement with the structures and patterns that underlie mathematical and geometrical thought, advocating for models that embrace the richness and complexity of human understanding.

(E) Find a sum of successive hexagonal numbers, starting from 1 , that is not a cube.
I am going to try to convince you that this computation will indeed continue for ever without stopping. First of all, a cube is called a cube because it is a number that can be represented as a cubic array of points as depicted in Fig. 2. 1 . I want you to try to think of such an array as built up successively, starting at one corner and then adding a succession of three-faced arrangements each consisting of a back wall, side wall, and ceiling, as depicted in Fig. 2.2. Now view this three-faced arrangement from a long way out, along the direction of the corner common to all three faces. What do we see? A hexagon as in Fig. 2.3. The marks that constitute these hexagons, successively increasing in size, when taken together, correspond to the marks that constitute the entire cube. This, then, establishes the fact that adding together successive hexagonal numbers, starting with 1 , will always give a cube. Accordingly, we have indeed ascertained that (E) will never stop.

— Roger Penrose, Shadows of the Mind, p. 89

Roger Penrose’s scientific contributions are deeply rooted in his early fascination with geometry. Encouraged by his father, a biologist with a keen interest in mathematics, he developed an appreciation for geometric shapes and patterns from a young age. This formative influence shaped his distinctive approach to problem-solving, driving him to create innovative mathematical tools and representations. Among these is Penrose tiling—a method of covering a plane with non-repeating patterns—a striking demonstration of his ability to blend aesthetic elegance with mathematical rigor.

This affinity for geometry extends beyond mathematics into art. Inspired by the work of M.C. Escher, he was captivated by the explorations of impossible structures and infinite patterns, which prompted his own investigations into the intersection of geometry and art. His contributions to mathematical art reflect his broader pursuit of understanding, where visual and conceptual insights merge to reveal deeper truths about structure and form.

Penrose’s geometric approach also offers a framework for exploring cognition. His view that geometry underpins not only the physical world but also mental processes suggests new ways of understanding thought and consciousness. The integration of spatial reasoning with abstract problem-solving, hints at the potential for geometry to illuminate the mechanisms of the mind, bridging the divide between the material and the mental through shared structural principles.

By investigating the intricate patterns and structures of the universe, he invites us to uncover the principles that govern both the physical and the conceptual. This perspective bridges the divide between the tangible and the abstract, presenting the cosmos as an integrated whole where geometry provides a common language for understanding existence.

This is, in part, due to the view that the universe is a geometric construct, of which structure is shaped by the interplay of mathematics and physics. Every piece of it—whether it describes a black hole, a conscious mind, or a geometric pattern—forms part of a larger, interconnected design. This cosmic architecture, though only partially understood, serves as a framework for exploring the fundamental nature of reality.

Objective mathematical notions must be thought of as timeless entities and are not to be regarded as being conjured into existence at the moment that they are first humanly perceived.

― Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe

In his later work on consciousness, Penrose has proposed that the brain’s ability to understand and manipulate geometric structures may be linked to quantum processes occurring within neurons. This idea, known as Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR), suggests that consciousness arises from quantum computations occurring within microtubules in brain cells. These computations, according to Penrose, are non-algorithmic and involve the manipulation of geometric structures at the quantum level.

I argue that the phenomenon of consciousness cannot be accommodated within the framework of present-day physical theory.

― Roger Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics

Penrose’s Orch OR theory is suggesting a bridge between two seemingly disparate worlds: the physical world of neurons and the immaterial world of conscious experience. This bridge, constructed from the building blocks of quantum mechanics, offers a path for us to traverse these two worlds, to explore the mysterious landscape of the mind from the vantage point of the physical brain.

His theory posits that consciousness arises from quantum computations within the brain’s neurons. This bold hypothesis, bridging the gap between the physical and the mental, has sparked intense debate and research in the scientific community. Nonetheless, the unique approach to visualizing complex mathematical and physical concepts provides a model for how we might navigate cognition, how we might use geometric thinking to understand the workings of our own minds.

This perspective has significant implications for the field of cognitive geometry, which studies how humans and other animals understand and navigate the geometric properties of their environment. If Penrose’s ideas are correct, our ability to understand and manipulate geometric structures may be a fundamental aspect of consciousness, rooted in the quantum geometry of the brain itself.

The final conclusion of all this is rather alarming. For it suggests that we must seek a non-computable physical theory that reaches beyond every computable level of oracle machines (and perhaps beyond).

Roger Penrose, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness

Roger Penrose’s philosophy is deeply rooted in the Platonist view of reality, which posits that abstract mathematical forms and concepts exist in a realm of their own, independent of the physical world and human cognition. This “world of perfect forms” is a reference to Plato’s theory of Forms, which suggests that non-physical forms (or Ideas), and not the material world known to us through sensation, possess the highest and most fundamental kind of reality.

In Penrose’s view, this Platonic realm is not just an abstract mathematical playground, but it is the very blueprint of reality. The “perfect forms” he refers to are the mathematical structures and concepts that underpin the laws of physics and, by extension, all of physical reality. This is the “primary” world in Penrose’s tripartite division of reality, which also includes the physical world and the world of human consciousness. The physical world and the world of consciousness are “shadows” in the sense that they are manifestations or reflections of the underlying mathematical reality.

The physical world is a shadow in the sense that the laws of physics, which govern the behavior of the physical world, are themselves derived from the mathematical forms in the Platonic realm. Similarly, human consciousness is also a shadow, as Penrose believes that our ability to comprehend and manipulate mathematical concepts suggests a deep connection between the mind and the Platonic realm. This connection, he posits, could be rooted in quantum processes within the brain that are capable of interfacing with the geometric structures in the Platonic realm.

Fig. 1.3 Three ‘worlds’— the Platonic mathematical, the physical, and the mental—and the three profound mysteries in the connections between them. © Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality, p. 18

This perspective offers a profound and somewhat mystical view of reality, where the physical world we inhabit and our conscious experiences are but reflections of a deeper, mathematical reality. It’s a view that places mathematics not just as a tool for understanding the universe, but as the very fabric of reality itself.

Penrose’s work is a testament to the power of the human mind, to our ability to decipher the patterns of the universe, to bridge the gap between the physical and the mental, to find beauty in the complexity of the world around us. His work is a reminder that we are all explorers, journeying through the cosmos in search of understanding, guided by the light of knowledge and the compass of curiosity.

I imagine that whenever the mind perceives a mathematical idea, it makes contact with Plato’s world of mathematical concepts… When mathematicians communicate, this is made possible by each one having a direct route to truth, the consciousness of each being in a position to perceive mathematical truths directly, through the process of ‘seeing’.

© 2013 - 2024 GEOMETRY MATTERS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Scroll To Top